A Contrastive Analysis of English and Albanian Somatic Idioms - A Cognitive Perspective

Authors

  • Arben Gaba “Eqrem Ҫabej” University, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Department of Foreign Languages, English Branch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/498diq14u

Keywords:

somatic idiom, cognition, metaphor, English, Albanian, culture

Abstract

In this paper we try to make a cognitive comparison between phraseological expressions originating from body-part terms in English and Albanian (taking English as our starting point). Although these languages are distant in space they do have similarities. This similarity / difference is seen better than nowhere else in the way how they conceive of the world (and the way this is expressed linguistically). They are at different stages of their linguistic cultivation where English is in a dominant position (remember here that every technological innovation has knock-on linguistic effects that affect every language including Albanian) and Albanian is in a defensive position since it has to cope with a host of concepts and realities that in one way or another have to be made tangible to Albanian speakers as well. Phraseological expressions are conceived as the tip of the iceberg of a process grounded upon transformational mechanisms (the best known of which are metaphors and metonymy) with emotional coloring adding to the mix. By way of illustration we give the following example: get blood from/out of a stone - nxjerr dhjam? nga pleshti, nxjerr uj? nga guri (extract fat out of a flea, extract water from the stone) Albanian literal translation in italics and brackets. From what we see, Albanians associate the equivalent of the English phraseological unit with water (since they are a Mediterranean country with dry summers), or with fat and flea (Albanians are known for their animal husbandry and meat-related terms).

Downloads

Published

2020-05-15

How to Cite

A Contrastive Analysis of English and Albanian Somatic Idioms - A Cognitive Perspective. (2020). European Journal of Language and Literature, 6(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.26417/498diq14u